Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act
An Act
To reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SEC. 2. Query Procedure Reform.
“(3) Restrictions imposed on federal bureau of investigation.—
“(A) Limits on authorizations of united states person queries.—
“(i) In general.—Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel must obtain prior approval from a Federal Bureau of Investigation supervisor (or employee of equivalent or greater rank) or attorney who is authorized to access unminimized contents or noncontents obtained through acquisitions authorized under subsection (a) for any query of such unminimized contents or noncontents made using a United States person query term.
“(ii) Exception.—A United States person query to be conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of unminimized contents or noncontents obtained through acquisitions authorized under subsection (a) using a United States person query term may be conducted without obtaining prior approval as specified in clause (i) only if the person conducting the United States person query has a reasonable belief that conducting the query could assist in mitigating or eliminating a threat to life or serious bodily harm.”
“(vi) Prohibition on political appointees within the process to approve federal bureau of investigation queries.—The procedures shall prohibit any political personnel, such as those classified by the Office of Personnel Management as Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation, Presidential Appointment (without Senate Confirmation), Noncareer Senior Executive Service Appointment, or Schedule C Excepted Appointment, from inclusion in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s prior approval process under clause (ii).”
“(D) Querying procedures applicable to federal bureau of investigation.—For any procedures adopted under paragraph (1) applicable to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall include the following requirements:
“(i) Training.—A requirement that, prior to conducting any query, personnel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation successfully complete training on the querying procedures on an annual basis.
“(ii) Additional prior approvals for sensitive queries.—A requirement that, absent exigent circumstances, prior to conducting certain queries, personnel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation receive approval, at minimum, as follows:
“(I) Approval from the Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation if the query uses a query term reasonably believed to identify a United States elected official, an appointee of the President or a State governor, a United States political candidate, a United States political organization or a United States person prominent in such organization, or a United States media organization or a United States person who is a member of such organization.
“(II) Approval from an attorney of the Federal Bureau of Investigation if the query uses a query term reasonably believed to identify a United States religious organization or a United States person who is prominent in such organization.
“(III) Approval from an attorney of the Federal Bureau of Investigation if such conduct involves batch job technology (or successor tool).
“(iii) Prior written justification.—A requirement that, prior to conducting a query using a United States person query term, personnel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation provide a written statement of the specific factual basis to support the reasonable belief that such query meets the standards required by the procedures adopted under paragraph (1). For each United States person query, the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall keep a record of the query term, the date of the conduct of the query, the identifier of the personnel conducting the query, and such written statement.
“(iv) Storage of certain contents and noncontents.—Any system of the Federal Bureau of Investigation that stores unminimized contents or noncontents obtained through acquisitions authorized under subsection (a) together with contents or noncontents obtained through other lawful means shall be configured in a manner that—
“(I) requires personnel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to affirmatively elect to include such unminimized contents or noncontents obtained through acquisitions authorized under subsection (a) when running a query; or
“(II) includes other controls reasonably expected to prevent inadvertent queries of such unminimized contents or noncontents.
“(v) Waiver authority for foreign intelligence surveillance court.—If the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court finds that the procedures adopted under paragraph (1) include measures that are reasonably expected to result in similar compliance outcomes as the measures specified in clauses (i) through (iv) of this subparagraph, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court may waive one or more of the requirements specified in such clauses.”
“(B) Notification requirement for certain fbi queries.—
“(i) Requirement.—The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall promptly notify appropriate congressional leadership of any query conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation using a query term that is reasonably believed to be the name or other personally identifying information of a member of Congress, and shall also notify the member who is the subject of such query.
“(ii) Appropriate congressional leadership defined.—In this subparagraph, the term ‘appropriate congressional leadership’ means the following:
“(I) The chairs and ranking minority members of the congressional intelligence committees.
“(II) The Speaker and minority leader of the House of Representatives.
“(III) The majority and minority leaders of the Senate.
“(iii) National security considerations.—In submitting a notification under clause (i), the Director shall give due regard to the protection of classified information, sources and methods, and national security.
“(iv) Waiver.—
“(I) In general.—The Director may waive a notification required under clause (i) if the Director determines such notification would impede an ongoing national security or law enforcement investigation.
“(II) Termination.—A waiver under subclause (I) shall terminate on the date the Director determines the relevant notification would not impede the relevant national security or law enforcement investigation or on the date that such investigation ends, whichever is earlier.”
“(C) Consent required for fbi to conduct certain queries for purpose of defensive briefing.—
“(i) Consent required.—The Federal Bureau of Investigation may not, for the exclusive purpose of supplementing the contents of a briefing on the defense against a counterintelligence threat to a member of Congress, conduct a query using a query term that is the name or restricted personal information (as such term is defined in section 119 of title 18, United States Code) of that member unless—
“(I) the member provides consent to the use of the query term; or
“(II) the Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation determines that exigent circumstances exist sufficient to justify the conduct of such query.
“(ii) Notification.—
“(I) Notification of consent sought.—Not later than three business days after submitting a request for consent from a member of Congress under clause (i), the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall notify the appropriate congressional leadership, regardless of whether the member provided such consent.
“(II) Notification of exception used.—Not later than three business days after the conduct of a query under clause (i) without consent on the basis of the existence of exigent circumstances determined under subclause (II) of such clause, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall notify the appropriate congressional leadership.
“(iii) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this subparagraph may be construed as—
“(I) applying to matters outside of the scope of the briefing on the defense against a counterintelligence threat to be provided or supplemented under clause (i); or
“(II) limiting the lawful investigative activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation other than supplementing the contents of a briefing on the defense against a counterintelligence threat to a member of Congress.
“(iv) Appropriate congressional leadership defined.—In this subparagraph, the term ‘appropriate congressional leadership’ means the following:
“(I) The chairs and ranking minority members of the congressional intelligence committees.
“(II) The Speaker and minority leader of the House of Representatives.
“(III) The majority and minority leaders of the Senate.”
SEC. 3. Limitation on Use of Information Obtained under Section 702.
“(2) Prohibition on conduct of queries that are solely designed to find and extract evidence of a crime.—
“(A) Limits on authorizations of united states person queries.—The querying procedures adopted pursuant to paragraph (1) for the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall prohibit queries of information acquired under subsection (a) that are solely designed to find and extract evidence of criminal activity.
“(B) Exceptions.—The restriction under subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to a query if—
“(i) there is a reasonable belief that such query may retrieve information that could assist in mitigating or eliminating a threat to life or serious bodily harm; or
“(ii) such query is necessary to identify information that must be produced or preserved in connection with a litigation matter or to fulfill discovery obligations in criminal matters under the laws of the United States or any State thereof.”
“(n) Restriction on Certain Information Available to Federal Bureau of Investigation.—
“(1) Restriction.—The Federal Bureau of Investigation may not ingest unminimized information acquired under this section into its analytic repositories unless the targeted person is relevant to an existing, open, predicated full national security investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“(2) Exception for exigent circumstances.—Paragraph (1) does not apply if the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation decides it is necessary due to exigent circumstances and provides notification within three business days to the congressional intelligence committees, the Speaker and minority leader of the House of Representatives, and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate.
“(3) Exception for assistance to other agencies.—Paragraph (1) does not apply where the Federal Bureau of Investigation has agreed to provide technical, analytical, or linguistic assistance at the request of another Federal agency.”
SEC. 4. Targeting Decisions under Section 702.
SEC. 5. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Reform.
“(5) An extension of an order issued under this title for surveillance targeted against a United States person, to the extent practicable and absent exigent circumstances, shall be granted or denied by the same judge who issued the original order unless the term of such judge has expired or such judge is otherwise no longer serving on the court.”
“(A) In general.—A court established”
“(iii) shall appoint one or more individuals who have been designated under paragraph (1) to serve as amicus curiae to assist such court in the consideration of any certification or procedures submitted for review pursuant to section 702, including any amendments to such certifications or procedures, if the court established under subsection (a) has not appointed an individual under clause (i) or (ii), unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate or is likely to result in undue delay.”
; and
“(B) Expertise.—In appointing one or more individuals under subparagraph (A)(iii), the court shall, to the maximum extent practicable, appoint an individual who possesses expertise in both privacy and civil liberties and intelligence collection.
“(C) Timing.—In the event that the court appoints one or more individuals or organizations pursuant to this paragraph to assist such court in a proceeding under section 702, notwithstanding subsection (j)(1)(B) of such section, the court shall issue an order pursuant to subsection (j)(3) of such section as expeditiously as possible consistent with subsection (k)(1) of such section, but in no event later than 60 days after the date on which such certification, procedures, or amendments are submitted for the court’s review, or later than 60 days after the court has issued an order appointing one or more individuals pursuant to this paragraph, whichever is earlier, unless a judge of that court issues an order finding that extraordinary circumstances necessitate additional time for review and that such extension of time is consistent with the national security.”
; and
“(A) be limited to addressing the specific issues identified by the court; and
“(B) provide to the court, as appropriate—”
; and
“(l) Designation of Counsel for Certain Applications.—To assist the court in the consideration of any application for an order pursuant to section 104 that targets a United States person, the presiding judge designated under subsection (a) shall designate one or more attorneys to review such applications, and provide a written analysis to the judge considering the application, of—
“(1) the sufficiency of the evidence used to make the probable cause determination under section 105(a)(2);
“(2) any material weaknesses, flaws, or other concerns in the application; and
“(3) a recommendation as to the following, which the judge shall consider during a proceeding on the application in which such attorney is present, as appropriate—
“(A) that the application should be approved, denied, or modified;
“(B) that the Government should supply additional information in connection with such application; or
“(C) that any requirements or conditions should be imposed on the Government for the approval of such application.”
SEC. 6. Application for an Order under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
“(F) that none of the information included in the statement described in paragraph (3) was solely produced by, derived from information produced by, or obtained using the funds of, a political organization (as such term is defined in section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), unless—
“(i) the political organization is clearly identified in the body of the statement described in paragraph (3);
“(ii) the information has been corroborated; and
“(iii) the investigative techniques used to corroborate the information are clearly identified in the body of the statement described in paragraph (3); and”
“(F) that none of the information included in the statement described in paragraph (3) was solely produced by, derived from information produced by, or obtained using the funds of, a political organization (as such term is defined in section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), unless—
“(i) the political organization is clearly identified in the body of the statement described in paragraph (3);
“(ii) the information has been corroborated; and
“(iii) the investigative techniques used to corroborate the information are clearly identified in the body of the statement described in paragraph (3); and”
“(G) that none of the information included in the statement described in paragraph (3) is attributable to or derived from the content of a media source unless the statement includes a clear identification of each author of that content, and where applicable, the publisher of that content, information to corroborate that which was derived from the media source, and an explanation of the investigative techniques used to corroborate the information;”
“(G) that none of the information included in the statement described in paragraph (3) is attributable to or derived from the content of a media source unless the statement includes a clear identification of each author of that content, where applicable, the publisher of that content, information to corroborate that which was derived from the media source, and an explanation of the investigative techniques used to corroborate the information;”
“(10) with respect to a target who is a United States person, a statement summarizing the investigative techniques carried out before making the application;”
“(11) in the case of an application for an extension of an order under this title for a surveillance targeted against a United States person, a summary statement of the foreign intelligence information obtained pursuant to the original order (and any preceding extension thereof) as of the date of the application for the extension, or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain such information; and”
“(9) in the case of an application for an extension of an order under this title in which the target of the physical search is a United States person, a summary statement of the foreign intelligence information obtained pursuant to the original order (and any preceding extension thereof) as of the date of the application for the extension, or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain such information; and”
SEC. 7. Public Disclosure and Declassification of Certain Documents.
SEC. 8. Transcriptions of Proceedings.
“(3) for any hearing, oral argument, or other proceeding before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review for which a court reporter produces a transcript, not later than 45 days after the government receives the final transcript or the date on which the matter of the hearing, oral argument, or other proceeding is resolved, whichever is later, a notice of the existence of such transcript. Not later than three business days after a committee referred to in subsection (a) requests to review an existing transcript, the Attorney General shall facilitate such request; and
“(4) a copy of each declassified document that has undergone review under section 602.”
SEC. 9. Audit of Fisa Compliance by Inspector General.
SEC. 10. Accuracy and Completeness of Applications.
“(12) a certification by the applicant or declarant that, to the best knowledge of the applicant or declarant, the Attorney General or a designated attorney for the Government has been apprised of all information that might reasonably—
“(A) call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or
“(B) otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings required under section 105(a).”
“(10) a certification by the applicant that, to the best knowledge of the applicant, the Attorney General or a designated attorney for the Government has been apprised of all information that might reasonably—
“(A) call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or
“(B) otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings required under section 304(a).”
“(4) a certification by the Federal Officer seeking to use the pen register or trap and trace device covered by the application that, to the best knowledge of the Federal Officer, the Attorney General or a designated attorney for the Government has been apprised of all information that might reasonably—
“(A) call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or
“(B) otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings required under subsection (d).”
“(E) a statement by the applicant that, to the best knowledge of the applicant, the application fairly reflects all information that might reasonably—
“(i) call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or
“(ii) otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings required under subsection (c).”
“(K) a certification by the applicant that, to the best knowledge of the applicant, the Attorney General or a designated attorney for the Government has been apprised of all information that might reasonably—
“(i) call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or
“(ii) otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings required under subsection (c).”
“(8) a certification by the applicant that, to the best knowledge of the applicant, the Attorney General or a designated attorney for the Government has been apprised of all information that might reasonably—
“(A) call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or
“(B) otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings required under subsection (c).”
“(13) non-cumulative information known to the applicant or declarant that is potentially exculpatory regarding the requested legal findings or any assessment in the application.”
“(11) non-cumulative information known to the applicant or declarant that is potentially exculpatory regarding the requested legal findings or any assessment in the application.”
“(5) non-cumulative information known to the Federal officer seeking to use the pen register or trap and trace device covered by the application, that is potentially exculpatory regarding the requested legal findings or any assessment in the application.”
“(F) non-cumulative information known to the applicant that is potentially exculpatory regarding the requested legal findings or any assessment in the application.”
“(L) non-cumulative information known to the applicant or declarant that is potentially exculpatory regarding the requested legal findings or any assessment in the application.”
“(9) non-cumulative information known to the applicant or declarant that is potentially exculpatory regarding the requested legal findings or any assessment in the application.”
SEC. 11. Annual Report of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Quarterly Report to Congress.
“(2) Nonapplicability to electronic mail address and telephone numbers.—Paragraph (3)(B) of subsection (b) shall not apply to orders resulting in the acquisition of information by the Federal Bureau of Investigation that does not include electronic mail addresses or telephone numbers.”
; and
“(f) Mandatory Reporting on Section 702 by Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation.—
“(1) Annual report.—The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall annually submit to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report that includes—
“(A) the number of United States person queries by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of unminimized contents or noncontents acquired pursuant to section 702(a);
“(B) the number of approved queries using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s batch job technology, or successor tool;
“(C) the number of queries using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s batch job technology, or successor tool, conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation against information acquired pursuant to section 702(a) for which pre-approval was not obtained due to emergency circumstances;
“(D) the number of United States person queries conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of unminimized contents or noncontents acquired pursuant to section 702(a) solely to retrieve evidence of a crime;
“(E) a good faith estimate of the number of United States person query terms used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct queries of unminimized contents or noncontents acquired pursuant to section 702(a) primarily to protect the United States person who is the subject of the query; and
“(F) a good faith estimate of the number of United States person query terms used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct queries of unminimized contents or noncontents acquired pursuant to section 702(a) where the United States person who is the subject of the query is a target or subject of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“(2) Public availability.—Subject to declassification review by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence, each annual report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be available to the public during the first April following the calendar year covered by the report.
“(3) Quarterly report.—Beginning on the date that is not later than 1 year after the effective date of this paragraph, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit a quarterly report to the congressional intelligence committees and to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate that includes the number of U.S. person queries conducted during that quarter.”
SEC. 12. Adverse Personnel Actions for Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“(e) Mandatory Reporting by Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation.—The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall annually submit to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, a report describing the accountability actions taken by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the preceding 12-month period for noncompliant querying of information acquired under section 702 and any such actions taken pursuant to section 103(m), to include the number of ongoing personnel investigations, the outcome of any completed personnel investigations and any related adverse personnel actions taken.”
SEC. 13. Criminal Penalties for Violations of Fisa.
“(3) knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States an application, in whole or in part, for an order for electronic surveillance under this Act.”
“(c) Penalty.—A person guilty of an offense in this section shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.”
“SEC. 709. PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE.
“(a) Offense.—A person is guilty of an offense under this section if that person knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information that contains the contents of any communication acquired under this title to which a known United States person is a party.
“(b) Penalty.—A person guilty of an offense in this section shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 8 years, or both.
“(c) Jurisdiction.—There is Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section if the person committing the offense was an officer or employee of the United States at the time the offense was committed.”
SEC. 14. Contempt Power of Fisc and Fisc–r.
“(G) the number of times the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review exercised authority under chapter 21 of title 18, United States Code and a description of each use of such authority.”
SEC. 15. Increased Penalties for Civil Actions.
“(a) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages equal to the greater of—
“(1) if the aggrieved person is a United States person, $10,000 or $1,000 per day for each day of violation; or
“(2) for any other aggrieved person, $1,000 or $100 per day for each day of violation;”
“SEC. 110A. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR CIVIL ACTIONS.
“(a) Report to Congress.—If a court finds that a person has violated this Act in a civil action under section 110, the head of the agency that employs that person shall report to Congress on the administrative action taken against that person pursuant to section 103(m) or any other provision of law.
“(b) Report to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.—If a court finds that a person has violated this Act in a civil action under section 110, the head of the agency that employs that person shall report the name of such person to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court shall maintain a list of each person about whom it received a report under this subsection.”
SEC. 16. Accountability Standards for Incidents Relating to Queries Conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“(4) Minimum accountability standards.—The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall issue minimum accountability standards that set forth escalating consequences for noncompliant querying of United States person terms within the contents of communications that were acquired under this section. Such standards shall include, at minimum, the following:
“(A) Zero tolerance for willful misconduct.
“(B) Escalating consequences for unintentional noncompliance, including the threshold for mandatory revocation of access to query information acquired under this section.
“(C) Consequences for supervisors who oversee users that engage in noncompliant queries.”
SEC. 17. Removal or Suspension of Federal Officers for Misconduct Before Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
“(m) Removal or Suspension of Federal Officers for Misconduct Before Courts.—An officer or employee of the United States Government who engages in intentional misconduct with respect to proceedings before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review shall be subject to appropriate adverse actions, including, at minimum, suspension without pay or removal, up to and including termination.”
SEC. 18. Reports and Other Matters.
SEC. 19. Extension of Certain Authorities.
SEC. 20. Amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
SEC. 21. Requirement for Recertification.
SEC. 22. Repeal of Authority for the Resumption of Abouts Collection.
SEC. 23. Inclusion of Counternarcotics in Definition of Foreign Intelligence.
“(D) international production, distribution, or financing of illicit synthetic drugs, opioids, cocaine, or other drugs driving overdose deaths, or precursors of any aforementioned; or”
SEC. 24. Vetting of Non-United States Persons.
“(6) Vetting of non-united states persons.—For any procedures for one or more agencies adopted under paragraph (1)(A), the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall ensure that the procedures enable the vetting of all non-United States persons who are being processed for travel to the United States using terms that do not qualify as United States person query terms under this Act.”
SEC. 25. Definition of Electronic Communication Service Provider.
“(E) any other service provider who has access to equipment that is being or may be used to transmit or store wire or electronic communications, but not including any entity that serves primarily as—
“(i) a public accommodation facility, as that term is defined in section 501(4);
“(ii) a dwelling, as that term is defined in section 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3602);
“(iii) a community facility, as that term is defined in section 315 of the Defense Housing and Community Facilities and Services Act of 1951 (42 U.S.C. 1592n); or
“(iv) a food service establishment, as that term is defined in section 281 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1638); or”
“(E) any other service provider who has access to equipment that is being or may be used to transmit or store wire or electronic communications, but not including any entity that serves primarily as—
“(i) a public accommodation facility, as that term is defined in section 501(4);
“(ii) a dwelling, as that term is defined in section 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3602);
“(iii) a community facility, as that term is defined in section 315 of the Defense Housing and Community Facilities and Services Act of 1951 (42 U.S.C. 1592n); or
“(iv) a food service establishment, as that term is defined in section 281 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1638);”
; and