Division B — Military Construction Authorizations
DIVISION B Military Construction Authorizations
SEC. 2002. Expiration of Authorizations and Amounts Required to Be Specified by Law.
SEC. 2003. Effective Date.
TITLE XXI Army Military Construction
SEC. 2101. Authorized Army Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska | Fort Wainwright | $114,000,000 |
| Arizona | Yuma Proving Ground | $14,000,000 |
| California | Military Ocean Terminal Concord | $46,000,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $28,000,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Gillem | $71,000,000 |
| Fort Gordon | $80,000,000 | |
| Hawaii | Aliamanu Military Reservation | $71,000,000 |
| Schofield Barracks | $39,000,000 | |
| Wheeler Army Airfield | $89,000,000 | |
| Louisiana | Fort Polk | $25,000,000 |
| Oklahoma | McAlester AAP | $35,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Fort Jackson | $7,000,000 |
| Virginia | Humphreys Engineer Center | $51,000,000 |
| State | Installation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | Casmera Renato Dal Din | $10,200,000 |
SEC. 2102. Family Housing.
| Country | Installation or Location | Units | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | Vicenza | Family Housing New Construction | $84,100,000 |
| Kwajalein | Kwajalein Atoll | Family Housing Replacement Construction | $32,000,000 |
SEC. 2103. Authorization of Appropriations, Army.
SEC. 2104. Limitation on Military Construction Project at Kwajalein Atoll.
SEC. 2105. Modification of Authority to Carry Out Fiscal Year 2017 Project at Camp Walker, Korea.
TITLE XXII Navy Military Construction
SEC. 2201. Authorized Navy Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | Camp Pendleton | $115,530,000 |
| Lemoore | $187,220,000 | |
| Point Mugu | $26,700,000 | |
| Port Hueneme | $43,500,000 | |
| San Diego | $128,500,000 | |
| Seal Beach | $46,800,000 | |
| Twentynine Palms | $76,500,000 | |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $114,900,000 |
| Maine | Kittery | $715,000,000 |
| NCTAMS LANT Detachment Cutler | $26,100,000 | |
| Nevada | Fallon | $29,040,000 |
| North Carolina | Cherry Point | $51,900,000 |
| Virginia | Norfolk | $39,800,000 |
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Bahrain Island | SW Asia | $68,340,000 |
| El Salvador | Comalapa | $28,000,000 |
| Greece | Souda Bay | $50,180,000 |
| Guam | Andersen Air Force Base | $21,280,000 |
| Joint Region Marianas | $546,550,000 | |
| Spain | Rota | $60,110,000 |
SEC. 2202. Family Housing and Improvements to Military Family Housing Units.
SEC. 2203. Authorization of Appropriations, Navy.
TITLE XXIII Air Force Military Construction
SEC. 2301. Authorized Air Force Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | Edwards Air Force Base | $40,000,000 |
| New Jersey | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | $22,000,000 |
| South Dakota | Ellsworth Air Force Base | $96,000,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $19,500,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $132,000,000 |
| Virginia | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | $19,500,000 |
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Guam | Andersen Air Force Base | $56,000,000 |
| Qatar | Al Udeid | $26,000,000 |
SEC. 2302. Family Housing and Improvements to Military Family Housing Units.
SEC. 2303. Authorization of Appropriations, Air Force.
SEC. 2304. Modification of Authority to Carry Out Certain Fiscal Year 2018 Project.
SEC. 2305. Modification of Authority to Carry Out Certain Fiscal Year 2019 Projects.
SEC. 2306. Modification of Authority to Carry Out Certain Fiscal Year 2020 Projects.
SEC. 2307. Technical Corrections Related to Authority to Carry Out Certain Fiscal Year 2020 Family Housing Projects.
TITLE XXIV Defense Agencies Military Construction
SEC. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Anniston Army Depot | $18,000,000 |
| Alaska | Fort Greely | $48,000,000 |
| Arizona | Fort Huachuca | $33,728,000 |
| Yuma | $49,500,000 | |
| California | Beale Air Force Base | $22,800,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $15,600,000 |
| CONUS Unspecified | CONUS Unspecified | $14,400,000 |
| Florida | Hurlburt Field | $83,120,000 |
| Kentucky | Fort Knox | $69,310,000 |
| New Mexico | Kirtland Air Force Base | $46,600,000 |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | $113,800,000 |
| Ohio | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | $23,500,000 |
| Texas | Fort Hood | $32,700,000 |
| Virginia | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story | $112,500,000 |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | $21,800,000 |
| Manchester | $82,000,000 |
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | Def Fuel Support Point Tsurumi | $49,500,000 |
| State/Country | Installation | Project | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon | Klamath Falls IAP | Fuel Facilities | $2,500,000 |
SEC. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Fort Rucker | $24,000,000 |
| Arkansas | Ebbing Air National Guard Base | $2,600,000 |
| California | Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms | $11,646,000 |
| Military Ocean Terminal Concord | $29,000,000 | |
| Naval Support Activity Monterey | $10,540,000 | |
| Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake | $8,950,000 | |
| District of Columbia | Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling | $44,313,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Benning | $17,000,000 |
| Maryland | Naval Support Activity Bethesda | $13,840,000 |
| Naval Support Activity South Potomac | $18,460,000 | |
| Missouri | Whiteman Air Force Base | $17,310,000 |
| Nevada | Creech Air Force Base | $32,000,000 |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | $6,100,000 |
| Ohio | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | $35,000,000 |
| Tennessee | Memphis Air National Guard Base | $4,780,000 |
| Virginia | Naval Medical Center Portsmouth | $611,000 |
| Surface Combat Systems Center Wallops Island | $9,100,000 |
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | Naval Support Activity Naples | $3,490,000 |
SEC. 2403. Authorization of Appropriations, Defense Agencies.
SEC. 2404. Independent Study on Western Emergency Refined Fuel Reserves.
TITLE XXV International Programs
Subtitle A North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
SEC. 2501. Authorized Nato Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
SEC. 2502. Authorization of Appropriations, Nato.
SEC. 2503. Execution of Projects under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.
“§ 2350m. Execution of projects under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
“(a) Authority To Execute Projects.—When the United States is designated as the Host Nation for purposes of executing a project under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (in this section referred to as the ‘Program’), the Secretary of Defense may accept such designation and carry out such project consistent with the requirements of this section.
“(b) Project Funding.—The Secretary of Defense may fund authorized expenditures of projects accepted under subsection (a) with—
“(1) contributions under subsection (c);
“(2) appropriations of the Department of Defense for the Program when directed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to apply amounts of such appropriations as part of the share of contributions of the United States for the Program; or
“(3) any combination of amounts described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
“(c) Authority To Accept Contributions.—
(1) The Secretary of Defense may accept contributions from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and member nations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for the purpose of carrying out a project under subsection (a).
“(2) Contributions accepted under paragraph (1) shall be placed in an account established for the purpose of carrying out the project for which the funds were provided and shall remain available until expended.
“(3)
(A) If contributions are made under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for a project or portion of a project previously completed by the Department of Defense, such contributions shall be credited to—
“(i) the appropriations used for the project or portion thereof, if such appropriations have not yet expired; or
“(ii) the appropriations for the Program, if the appropriations described in clause (i) have expired.
“(B) Funding credited under subparagraph (A) shall merge with and remain available for the same purposes and duration as the appropriations to which credited.
“(d) Obligation Authority.—The construction agent of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary of Defense to execute a project under subsection (a) may recognize the North Atlantic Treaty Organization project authorization amounts as budgetary resources to incur obligations against for the purposes of executing the project.
“(e) Insufficient Contributions.—
(1) In the event that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization does not agree to contribute funding for all costs necessary for the Department of Defense to carry out a project under subsection (a), including necessary personnel costs of the construction agent designated by the Department of Defense, contract claims, and any conjunctive funding requirements that exceed the project authorization or standards of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Secretary of Defense, upon determination that completion of the project is in the national interest of the United States, may fund such costs, and undertake such conjunctively funded requirements not otherwise authorized by law, using any unobligated funds available among funds appropriated for the Program for military construction.
“(2) The use of funds under paragraph (1) from appropriations for the Program may be in addition to or in place of any other funding sources otherwise available for the purposes for which those funds are used.
“(f) Authorized Expenditures Defined.—In this section, the term ‘authorized expenditures’ means project expenses for which the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has agreed to contribute funding.”
“2350m. Execution of projects under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.”.
Subtitle B Host Country In-Kind Contributions
SEC. 2511. Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects.
| Component | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Army | Camp Carroll | Site Development | $49,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Attack Reconnaissance Battalion Hangar | $99,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Hot Refuel Point | $35,000,000 |
| Navy | COMROKFLT Naval Base, Busan | Maritime Operations Center | $26,000,000 |
| Air Force | Daegu Air Base | AGE Facility and Parking Apron | $14,000,000 |
| Air Force | Kunsan Air Base | Backup Generator Plant | $19,000,000 |
| Air Force | Osan Air Base | Aircraft Corrosion Control Facility (Phase 3) | $12,000,000 |
| Air Force | Osan Air Base | Child Development Center | $20,000,000 |
| Air Force | Osan Air Base | Relocate Munitions Storage Area Delta (Phase 1) | $84,000,000 |
| Defense-Wide | Camp Humphreys | Elementary School | $58,000,000 |
SEC. 2512. Qatar Funded Construction Projects.
| Component | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (A12) | $63,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (B12) | $63,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (D10) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (009) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (007) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Armory/Mount | $7,200,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (A06) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Dining Facility | $14,600,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (BOS) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (B04) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (A04) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (AOS) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Dining Facility | $14,600,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | MSG (Base Operations Support Facility) | $9,300,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | ITN (Communications Facility) | $3,500,000 |
TITLE XXVI Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities
SEC. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona | Tucson | $18,100,000 |
| Arkansas | Fort Chaffee | $15,000,000 |
| California | Bakersfield | $9,300,000 |
| Colorado | Peterson Air Force Base | $15,000,000 |
| Indiana | Shelbyville | $12,000,000 |
| Kentucky | Frankfort | $15,000,000 |
| Mississippi | Brandon | $10,400,000 |
| Nebraska | North Platte | $9,300,000 |
| New Jersey | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | $15,000,000 |
| Ohio | Columbus | $15,000,000 |
| Oklahoma | Ardmore | $9,800,000 |
| Oregon | Hermiston | $25,035,000 |
| Puerto Rico | Fort Allen | $37,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Joint Base Charleston | $15,000,000 |
| Tennessee | McMinnville | $11,200,000 |
| Texas | Fort Worth | $13,800,000 |
| Utah | Nephi | $12,000,000 |
| Virgin Islands | St. Croix | $39,400,000 |
| Wisconsin | Appleton | $11,600,000 |
SEC. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Florida | Gainesville | $36,000,000 |
| Massachusetts | Devens Reserve Forces Training Area | $8,700,000 |
| North Carolina | Asheville | $24,000,000 |
| Wisconsin | Fort McCoy | $17,100,000 |
SEC. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Maryland | Reisterstown | $39,500,000 |
| Minnesota | Naval Operational Support Center Minneapolis | $12,800,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $25,010,000 |
SEC. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Montgomery Regional Airport | $23,600,000 |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $20,000,000 |
| Maryland | Joint Base Andrews | $9,400,000 |
| North Dakota | Hector International Airport | $17,500,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $10,800,000 |
SEC. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| State | Installation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth | $39,200,000 |
SEC. 2606. Authorization of Appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
SEC. 2607. Modification of Authority to Carry Out Fiscal Year 2020 Project in Alabama.
TITLE XXVII Base Realignment and Closure Activities
SEC. 2701. Authorization of Appropriations for Base Realignment and Closure Activities Funded Through Department of Defense Base Closure Account.
SEC. 2702. Prohibition on Conducting Additional Base Realignment and Closure (brac) Round.
SEC. 2703. Plan to Finish Remediation Activities Conducted by the Secretary of the Army in Umatilla, Oregon.
TITLE XXVIII Military Construction General Provisions
Subtitle A Military Construction Program Changes
SEC. 2801. Modification and Clarification of Construction Authority in the Event of a Declaration of War or National Emergency.
“(c) Limitation on Amount of Funds Available for National Emergency.—
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, the total cost of all military construction projects undertaken using that authority during the national emergency may not exceed $500,000,000.
“(2) In the event of a national emergency declaration in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) will be used only within the United States, the total cost of all military construction projects undertaken using that authority during the national emergency may not exceed $100,000,000.”
“(b) Conditions on Sources of Funds.—A military construction project to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a) may be undertaken only within the total amount of funds that have been appropriated for military construction, excluding funds appropriated for family housing, that—
“(1) remain unobligated as of the date on which the first contract would be entered into in support of the national emergency declaration described in subsection (a); and
“(2) are available because the military construction project for which the funds were appropriated—
“(A) has been canceled; or
“(B) has reduced costs as a result of project modifications or other cost savings.”
“(d) Waiver of Other Provisions of Law in Event of National Emergency.—In the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, the authority provided by such subsection to waive or disregard another provision of law that would otherwise apply to a military construction project authorized by this section may be used only if—
“(1) such other provision of law does not provide a means by which compliance with the requirements of the law may be waived, modified, or expedited; and
“(2) the Secretary of Defense determines that the nature of the national emergency necessitates the noncompliance with the requirements of the law.”
“(A) The reasons for the decision to use the construction authority described in subsection (a), including, in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency, the reasons why use of the armed forces is required in response to the declared national emergency.
“(B) The construction projects to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a), including, in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency, an explanation of how each construction project directly supports the immediate security, logistical, or short-term housing and ancillary supporting facility needs of the members of the armed forces used in the national emergency.
“(C) The estimated cost of the construction projects to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a), including the cost of any real estate action pertaining to the construction projects, and certification of compliance with the funding conditions imposed by subsections (b) and (c).
“(D) Any determination made pursuant to subsection (d)(2) to waive or disregard another provision of law to undertake any construction project using the construction authority described in subsection (a).
“(E) The military construction projects, including any ancillary supporting facility projects, whose cancellation, modification, or other cost savings result in funds being available to undertake construction projects using the construction authority described in subsection (a) and the possible impact of the cancellation or modification of such military construction projects on military readiness and the quality of life of members of the armed forces and their dependents.”
; and
“(2) In the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, a construction project to be undertaken using such construction authority may be carried out only after the end of the five-day period beginning on the date the notification required by paragraph (1) is received by the congressional defense committees.”
SEC. 2802. Extension of Sunset for Annual Locality Adjustment of Dollar Thresholds Applicable to Unspecified Minor Military Construction Authorities.
SEC. 2803. Modification of Reporting Requirements Regarding Certain Military Construction Projects and Military Family Housing Projects, Contracts, and Agreements.
SEC. 2804. Consideration of Energy Security and Energy Resilience in Life-Cycle Cost for Military Construction.
“§ 2816. Consideration of energy security and energy resilience in life-cycle cost for military construction
“(a) In General.—
(1) The Secretary concerned, when evaluating the life-cycle designed cost of a covered military construction project, shall include as a facility requirement the long-term consideration of energy security and energy resilience that would ensure that the resulting facility is capable of continuing to perform its missions, during the life of the facility, in the event of a natural or human-caused disaster, an attack, or any other unplanned event that would otherwise interfere with the ability of the facility to perform its missions.
“(2) A facility requirement under paragraph (1) shall not be weighed, for cost purposes, against other facility requirements in determining the design of the facility.
“(b) Inclusion in the Building Life-cycle Cost Program.—The Secretary shall include the requirements of subsection (a) in applying the latest version of the building life-cycle cost program, as developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to consider on-site distributed energy assets in a building design for a covered military construction project.
“(c) Covered Military Construction Project Defined.—
(1) In this section, the term ‘covered military construction project’ means a military construction project for a facility that is used to perform critical functions during a natural or human-caused disaster, an attack, or any other unplanned event.
“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘facility’ includes at a minimum any of the following:
“(A) Operations centers.
“(B) Nuclear command and control facilities.
“(C) Integrated strategic and tactical warning and attack assessment facilities.
“(D) Continuity of government facilities.
“(E) Missile defense facilities.
“(F) Air defense facilities.
“(G) Hospitals.
“(H) Armories and readiness centers of the National Guard.
“(I) Communications facilities.
“(J) Satellite and missile launch and control facilities.”
“2816. Consideration of energy security and energy resilience in life-cycle cost for military construction.”.
SEC. 2805. Congressional Project Authorization Required for Military Construction Projects for Energy Resilience, Energy Security, and Energy Conservation.
“§ 2914. Military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation
“(a) Project Authorization Required.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out such military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation as are authorized by law, using funds appropriated or otherwise made available for that purpose.
“(b) Submission of Project Proposals.—
(1) As part of the Department of Defense Form 1391 submitted to the appropriate committees of Congress for a military construction project covered by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall include the following information:
“(A) The project title.
“(B) The location of the project.
“(C) A brief description of the scope of work.
“(D) The original project cost estimate and the current working cost estimate, if different.
“(E) Such other information as the Secretary considers appropriate.
“(2) In the case of a military construction project for energy conservation, the Secretary also shall include the following information:
“(A) The original expected savings-to-investment ratio and simple payback estimates and measurement and verification cost estimate.
“(B) The most current expected savings-to-investment ratio and simple payback estimates and measurement and verification plan and costs.
“(C) A brief description of the measurement and verification plan and planned funding source.
“(3) In the case of a military construction project for energy resilience or energy security, the Secretary also shall include the rationale for how the project would enhance mission assurance, support mission critical functions, and address known vulnerabilities.
“(c) Application to Military Construction Projects.—This section shall apply to military construction projects covered by subsection (a) for which a Department of Defense Form 1391 is submitted to the appropriate committees of Congress in connection with the budget of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2023 and thereafter.”
“2914. Military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation.”.
SEC. 2806. One-Year Extension of Temporary, Limited Authority to Use Operation and Maintenance Funds for Construction Projects in Certain Areas Outside the United States.
“(C) The period beginning October 1, 2020, and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2021, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military activities of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2022.”
SEC. 2807. Responsibility of Navy for Military Construction Requirements for Certain Fleet Readiness Centers.
Subtitle B Military Family Housing Reforms
SEC. 2811. Modifications and Technical Corrections Related to Military Housing Privatization Reform.
“(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a nondisclosure agreement executed—
“(A) as part of the settlement of litigation; or
“(B) to avoid litigation if the tenant has retained legal counsel or has sought military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title.”
“(11) Upon request by a prospective tenant, a landlord providing a housing unit shall ensure that the needs of enrollees in the Exceptional Family Member Program, or any successor program, are considered in assigning the prospective tenant to a housing unit provided by the landlord.”
; and
“(a) Maintenance Information for Prospective Tenants.—The Secretary concerned shall require each eligible entity or subsequent landlord that offers for lease a housing unit to provide to a prospective tenant of the housing unit—
“(1) not later than five business days before the prospective tenant is asked to sign the lease, a summary of maintenance conducted with respect to that housing unit for the previous seven years; and
“(2) not later than two business days after the prospective tenant requests additional information regarding maintenance conducted with respect to that housing unit during such period, all information possessed by the eligible entity or subsequent landlord regarding such maintenance conducted during such period.
“(b) Maintenance Information for Existing Tenants.—A tenant of a housing unit who did not receive maintenance information described in subsection (a) regarding that housing unit while a prospective tenant may request such maintenance information and shall receive such maintenance information not later than five business days after the making the request.
“(c) Maintenance Defined.—In the section, the term ‘maintenance’ includes any renovations of the housing unit during the period specified in subsection (a)(1).”
“(6) The dispute resolution process shall require the installation or regional commander (as the case may be) to record each dispute in the complaint database established under section 2894a of this title.”
“(6) Except as provided in paragraph (5)(B), a final decision shall be transmitted to the tenant, landlord, and the installation or regional commander (as the case may be) not later than 30 calendar days after the request was submitted.”
; and
“(d) Effect of Failure to Comply With Decision.—
(1) If the final decision rendered under subsection (c) for resolution of a landlord-tenant dispute includes instructions for the landlord responsible for the housing unit to further remediate the housing unit, the decision shall specify a reasonable period of time, but not less than 10 business days, for the landlord to complete the remediation.
“(2) If the landlord does not remediate the issues before the end of the time period specified in the final decision in a manner consistent with the instructions contained in the decision, any amounts payable to the landlord for the housing unit shall be reduced by 10 percent for each period of five calendar days during which the issues remain unremediated.
“(e) Request to Withhold Payments During Resolution Process.—
(1) As part of the submission of a request for resolution of a landlord-tenant dispute through the dispute resolution process regarding maintenance guidelines or procedures or habitability, the tenant may request that all or part of the payments described in paragraph (3) for lease of the housing unit be segregated and not used by the property owner, property manager, or landlord pending completion of the dispute resolution process.
“(2) The amount allowed to be withheld under paragraph (1) shall be limited to amounts associated with the period during which—
“(A) the landlord has not met maintenance guidelines and procedures established by the Department of Defense, either through contract or otherwise; or
“(B) the housing unit is uninhabitable according to State and local law for the jurisdiction in which the housing unit is located.
“(3) This subsection applies to the following:
“(A) Any basic allowance for housing payable to the tenant (including for any dependents of the tenant in the tenant’s household) under section 403 of title 37.
“(B) All or part of any pay of a tenant subject to allotment as described in section 2882(c) of this title.”
“(10) An assessment of the dispute resolution process under section 2894(c) of this title, which shall include a list of dispute resolution cases by installation and the final outcome of each case.”
“2851a. Supervision of military housing by Chief Housing Officer.”.
“2892b. Prohibition on requirement to disclose personally identifiable information in requests for certain maintenance.”.
SEC. 2812. Repeal of Authority to Lease Substandard Family Housing Units to Members of the Uniformed Services.
SEC. 2813. Expenditure Priorities in Using Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund.
“(B) The Secretary of Defense shall require that eligible entities receiving amounts from the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund prioritize the use of such amounts for expenditures related to asset recapitalization, operating expenses, and debt payments before other program management-incentive fee expenditures. In the case of asset recapitalization, the primary purpose of the expenditures must be to sustain existing housing units owned or managed by the eligible entity or for which the eligible entity is otherwise responsible.”
SEC. 2814. Availability of Information Regarding Assessment of Performance Metrics for Contracts for Provision or Management of Privatized Military Housing.
“(A) An assessment of the indicators underlying the performance metrics for each contract for the provision or management of housing units to ensure such indicators adequately measure the condition and quality of each housing unit covered by the contract.
“(B) Information”
“(2)
(A) For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the indicators underlying the performance metrics for a contract for the provision or management of housing units shall measure at a minimum the following:
“(i) Tenant satisfaction.
“(ii) Maintenance management.
“(iii) Safety.
“(iv) Financial management.
“(B) An assessment required to be made available under paragraph (1)(A) shall include a detailed description of each indicator underlying the performance metrics, including the following information:
“(i) The limitations of available survey data.
“(ii) How tenant satisfaction and maintenance management is calculated.
“(iii) Whether any relevant data is missing.”
“§ 2891c. Transparency regarding finances and performance metrics”
“2891c. Transparency regarding finances and performance metrics.”.
SEC. 2815. Requirement That Secretary of Defense Implement Recommendations Relating to Military Family Housing Contained in Report by Inspector General of Department of Defense.
SEC. 2816. Promulgation of Guidance to Facilitate Return of Military Families Displaced from Privatized Military Housing.
SEC. 2817. Promulgation of Guidance on Relocation of Residents of Military Housing Impacted by Presence of Mold.
SEC. 2818. Expansion of Uniform Code of Basic Standards for Privatized Military Housing and Hazard and Habitability Inspection and Assessment Requirements to Government-Owned and Government-Controlled Military Family Housing.
Subtitle C Real Property and Facilities Administration
SEC. 2821. Acceptance of Property by Military Service Academies, Professional Military Education Schools, and Military Museums Subject to Naming-Rights Condition.
“(5) In this subsection, the term ‘eligible entity’ means each of the following:
“(A) The United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, and the Coast Guard Academy.
“(B) The professional military education schools listed in section 2162(d) of this title and the Defense Acquisition University.
“(C) A military museum.”
SEC. 2822. Codification of Reporting Requirements Regarding United States Overseas Military Enduring Locations and Contingency Locations.
“(B) the status of overseas military locations, whether such a location is designated as an enduring location or contingency location.”
; and
“(2) To satisfy the reporting requirement specified in paragraph (1)(B), a report under paragraph (1) shall contain the following:
“(A) A list of overseas military locations. For any overseas military location established during the previous fiscal year, the reasons for the establishment of the overseas military location.
“(B) A description of the strategic goal and operational requirements supported by each overseas military location.
“(C) A list of each construction or facility improvement project carried out by the Department of Defense regardless of the funding source, and each construction or facility improvement project accepted as a payment-in-kind, at overseas military locations during the previous fiscal year if the construction or facility improvement project was not specifically authorized in a Military Construction Authorization Act or congressional notice of the construction or facility improvement project was not provided by another means. Each construction or facility improvement project on the list shall be delineated by project location, project title or description, project cost, including costs covered by the host country, and authority used to undertake the project.
“(D) For each overseas military location first designated as an enduring location in one of the previous two required reports, a list of required construction and facility improvement projects anticipated to be carried out by the Department of Defense directly or through the acceptance of payments-in-kind during the fiscal year in which the report is submitted and the next four fiscal years. Each construction or facility improvement project on the list shall be delineated by project location, project title or description, estimated project cost, including costs anticipated to be covered by the host country, and authority to be used to undertake the project.
“(E) An overview of any annual lease or access costs to the United States for each overseas military location designated as an enduring location.
“(F) A description of any plans to transition an existing contingency overseas military location to an enduring overseas military location, or to upgrade or downgrade the designation of an existing enduring or contingency overseas military location, during the fiscal year in which the report is submitted.
“(G) A list of any overseas military locations that, during the previous fiscal year, were transferred to the control of security forces of the host country or another military force, closed, or for any other reason no longer used by the armed forces, including a summary of any costs associated with the transfer or closure of the overseas military location.
“(H) A summary of any force protection risks identified for cooperative security locations and contingency locations, the actions proposed to mitigate such risks, and the resourcing and implementation plan to implement the mitigation actions.
“(I) Such other such matters related to overseas military locations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
“(3) In this subsection:
“(A)
(i) The term ‘overseas military location’ covers both enduring locations and contingency locations established outside the United States.
“(ii) An enduring location is primarily characterized either by the presence of permanently assigned United States forces with robust infrastructure and quality of life amenities to support that presence, by the sustained presence of allocated United States forces with infrastructure and quality of life amenities consistent with that presence, or by the periodic presence of allocated United States forces with little or no permanent United States military presence or controlled infrastructure. Enduring locations include main operating bases, forward operating sites, and cooperative security locations.
“(iii) A contingency location refers to a location outside of the United States that is not covered by subparagraph (B), but that is used by United States forces to support and sustain operations during named and unnamed contingency operations or other operations as directed by appropriate authority and is categorized by mission life-cycle requirements as initial, temporary, or semi-permanent.
“(B)
(i) The term ‘construction or facility improvement project’ includes any construction, development, conversion, or extension of a building, structure, or other improvement to real property carried out at an overseas military location, whether to satisfy temporary or permanent requirements, and any acquisition of land for an overseas military location.
“(ii) The term does not include repairs to a building, structure, or other improvement to real property, unless the building, structure, or other improvement cannot effectively be used for its designated functional purpose in the absence of the repairs.
“(4) The Secretary of Defense shall prepare the report under paragraph (1) in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment.
“(5) A report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex as necessary.”
“§ 2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and status of United States overseas military locations”
“2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and status of United States overseas military locations.”.
SEC. 2823. Promotion of Energy Resilience and Energy Security in Privatized Utility Systems.
“(c) Relation to Certain Other Authorities.—A project under this section may include—
“(1) activities related to a utility system authorized under subsections (h), (j), and (k) of section 2688 or section 2913 of this title, notwithstanding that the United States does not own the utility system covered by the project; and
“(2) energy-related activities included as a separate requirement in an energy savings performance contract (as defined in section 804(3) of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8287c(3))).”
SEC. 2824. Vesting Exercise of Discretion with Secretaries of the Military Departments Regarding Entering into Longer-Term Contracts for Utility Services.
SEC. 2825. Use of On-Site Energy Production to Promote Military Installation Energy Resilience and Energy Security.
“(h) Promotion of On-Site Energy Security and Energy Resilience.—
(1) Consistent with the energy security and resilience goals of the Department of Defense and the energy performance master plan referred to in this section, the Secretary concerned shall consider, when feasible, projects for the production of installation energy that benefits military readiness and promotes installation energy security and energy resilience in the following manner:
“(A) Location of the energy-production infrastructure on the military installation that will consume the energy.
“(B) Incorporation of energy resilience features, such as microgrids, to ensure that energy remains available to the installation even when the installation is not connected to energy sources located off the installation.
“(C) Reduction in periodic refueling needs from sources off the installation to not more than once every two years.
“(3) In this subsection, the term ‘microgrid’ means an integrated energy system consisting of interconnected loads and energy resources that, if necessary, can be removed from the local utility grid and function as an integrated, stand-alone system.”
“(2)
(A) Using amounts made available for military construction projects under section 2914 of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out at least four projects to promote installation energy security and energy resilience in the manner described in paragraph (1).
“(B) At least one project shall be designed to develop technology that demonstrates the ability to connect an existing on-site energy generation facility that uses solar power with one or more installation facilities performing critical missions in a manner that allows the generation facility to continue to provide electrical power to these facilities even if the installation is disconnected from the commercial power supply.
“(C) At least one project shall be designed to develop technology that demonstrates that one or more installation facilities performing critical missions can be isolated, for purposes of electrical power supply, from the remainder of the installation and from the commercial power supply in a manner that allows an on-site energy generation facility that uses a renewable energy source, other than solar energy, to provide the necessary power exclusively to these facilities.
“(D) At least two projects shall be designed to develop technology that demonstrates the ability to store sufficient electrical energy from an on-site energy generation facility that uses a renewable energy source to provide the electrical energy required to continue operation of installation facilities performing critical missions during nighttime operations.
“(E) The authority of the Secretary of Defense to commence a project under this paragraph expires on September 30, 2025.”
SEC. 2826. Improved Electrical Metering of Department of Defense Infrastructure Supporting Critical Missions.
SEC. 2827. Improving Water Management and Security on Military Installations.
SEC. 2828. Prohibition Relating to Closure or Return to Host Nation of Existing Military Installations, Infrastructure, or Real Property in Europe.
Subtitle D Land Conveyances
SEC. 2831. Land Conveyance, Camp Navajo, Arizona.
SEC. 2832. Modification of Land Exchange Involving Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, Sunnyvale, California.
“(1) real property, including improvements thereon, located in Titusville, Florida, that will replace the NIROP and meet the readiness requirements of the Department of the Navy, as determined by the Secretary; and
“(2) reimbursement for the costs of relocation of contractor and Government personnel and equipment from the NIROP to the replacement facilities, to the extent specified in the land exchange agreement contemplated in subsection (b).”
“(c) Valuation.—The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the properties, including improvements thereon, to be exchanged by the Secretary and the Exchange Entity under subsection (a).
“(d) Compensation.—
“(1) Compensation required.—The Exchange Entity shall provide compensation under the land exchange agreement described in subsection (b) that is equal to or exceeds the fair market value of the NIROP, as determined under subsection (c).
“(2) In-kind consideration.—As part of the compensation under the land exchange agreement, the Secretary and the Exchange Entity may agree for the Exchange Entity to provide the following forms of in-kind consideration at any property or facility under the control of the Secretary:
“(A) Alteration, repair, improvement, or restoration (including environmental restoration) of property.
“(B) Use of facilities by the Secretary.
“(C) Provision of real property maintenance services.
“(D) Provision of or payment of utility services.
“(E) Provision of such other services relating to activities that will occur on the property as the Secretary considers appropriate.
“(3) Deposit.—The Secretary shall deposit any cash payments received under the land exchange agreement, other than cash payments accepted under section 2695 of title 10, United States Code, in the account in the Treasury established pursuant to section 572(b) of title 40, United States Code.
“(4) Use of proceeds.—Proceeds deposited pursuant to paragraph (3) in the account referred to in such paragraph shall be available to the Secretary in such amounts as provided in appropriations Acts for the following activities:
“(A) Maintenance, protection, alternation, repair, improvement, or restoration (including environmental restoration) of property or facilities.
“(B) Payment of utilities services.
“(C) Real property maintenance services.”
SEC. 2833. Land Conveyance, Sharpe Army Depot, Lathrop, California.
SEC. 2834. Land Exchange, San Bernardino County, California.
SEC. 2835. Land Conveyance, Over-The-Horizon Backscatter Radar System Receiving Station, Modoc County, California.
SEC. 2836. Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida, Parcel.
SEC. 2837. Lease Extension, Bryan Multi-Sports Complex, Wayne County, North Carolina.
SEC. 2838. Land Conveyances, Milan Army Ammunition Plant, Tennessee.
Subtitle E Military Land Withdrawals
SEC. 2841. Renewal of Land Withdrawal and Reservation to Benefit Naval Air Facility, El Centro, California.
SEC. 2842. Renewal of Fallon Range Training Complex Land Withdrawal and Reservation.
SEC. 2843. Renewal of Nevada Test and Training Range Land Withdrawal and Reservation.
SEC. 2844. Establishment of Interagency Committees on Joint Use of Certain Land Withdrawn from Appropriation under Public Land Laws.
“(5) Intergovernmental executive committee.—
“(A) Establishment.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall jointly establish, by memorandum of understanding, an intergovernmental executive committee (referred to in this paragraph as the ‘executive committee’), for the purpose of exchanging views, information, and advice relating to the management of the natural and cultural resources of the land described in paragraph (2).
“(B) Memorandum of understanding.—The memorandum of understanding entered into under subparagraph (A) shall include—
“(i) a description of the officials and other individuals to be invited to participate as members in the executive committee under subparagraph (C);
“(ii) a description of the duties of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the executive committee; and
“(iii) subject to subparagraphs (D) and (E), a procedure for—
“(I) creating a forum to carry out the purpose described in subparagraph (A);
“(II) rotating the Chairperson of the executive committee; and
“(III) scheduling regular meetings of the executive committee.
“(C) Membership.—The executive committee shall be comprised of—
“(i) 1 representative of the Nevada Department of Wildlife;
“(ii) 1 representative of the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources;
“(iii) 1 county commissioner from each of Churchill, Lyon, Nye, Mineral, and Pershing Counties, Nevada;
“(iv) 1 representative of each Indian tribe in the vicinity of the land described in paragraph (2); and
“(v) not more than 3 members that the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior jointly determine would advance the goals and objectives of the executive committee.
“(D) Chairperson and vice chairperson.—The members of the executive committee shall elect from among the members—
“(i) 1 member to serve as Chairperson of the executive committee; and
“(ii) 1 member to serve as Vice Chairperson of the executive committee.
“(E) Meetings.—
“(i) Frequency.—The executive committee shall meet not less frequently than 3 times each calendar year.
“(ii) Location.—The location of the meetings of the executive committee shall rotate to facilitate ease of access for all members of the executive committee.
“(iii) Public accessibility.—The meetings of the executive committee shall—
“(I) be open to the public; and
“(II) serve as a forum for the public to provide comments regarding the natural and cultural resources of the land described in paragraph (2).
“(F) Conditions and terms.—
“(i) In general.—Each member of the executive committee shall serve voluntarily and without compensation.
“(ii) Term of appointment.—
“(I) In general.—Except as provided in subclause (II)(bb), each member of the executive committee shall be appointed for a term of 4 years.
“(II) Original members.—Of the members initially appointed to the executive committee, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall select—
“(aa) ½ to serve for a term of 4 years; and
“(bb) ½ to serve for a term of 2 years.
“(iii) Reappointment and replacement.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior may reappoint or replace, as appropriate, a member of the executive committee if—
“(I) the term of the member has expired;
“(II) the member has resigned; or
“(III) the position held by the member has changed to the extent that the ability of the member to represent the group or entity that the member represents has been significantly affected.
“(G) Liaisons.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall each appoint appropriate operational and land management personnel of the Department of the Navy and the Department of the Interior, respectively, to serve as liaisons to the executive committee.”
“(G) Interagency committee.—
“(i) In general.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly establish an interagency committee (referred to in this subparagraph as the ‘interagency committee’) to facilitate coordination, manage public access needs and requirements, and minimize potential conflict between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Air Force with respect to joint operating areas within the Desert National Wildlife Refuge.
“(ii) Membership.—The interagency committee shall include only the following members:
“(I) Representatives from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
“(II) Representatives from the Department of the Air Force.
“(III) The Project Leader of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
“(IV) The Commander of the Nevada Test and Training Range, Nellis Air Force Base.
“(iii) Report to congress.—The interagency committee shall biannually submit to the Committees on Armed Services, Environment and Public Works, and Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, and make available publicly online, a report on the activities of the interagency committee.”
“(H) Intergovernmental executive committee.—
“(i) Establishment.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly establish, by memorandum of understanding, an intergovernmental executive committee (referred to in this subparagraph as the ‘executive committee’) in accordance with this subparagraph.
“(ii) Purpose.—The executive committee shall be established for the purposes of—
“(I) exchanging views, information, and advice relating to the management of the natural and cultural resources of the lands withdrawn and reserved by this section; and
“(II) discussing and making recommendations to the interagency committee established under subparagraph (G) with respect to public access needs and requirements.
“(iii) Composition.—The executive committee shall comprise the following members:
“(I) Federal agencies.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each appoint 1 representative from an interested Federal agency.
“(II) State government.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite 1 representative of the Nevada Department of Wildlife.
“(III) Local governments.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite 1 county commissioner of each of Clark, Nye, and Lincoln Counties, Nevada.
“(IV) Tribal governments.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite 1 representative of each Indian tribe in the vicinity of the portions of the joint use area of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge where the Secretary of the Interior exercises primary jurisdiction.
“(V) Public.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite not more than 3 private individuals who the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force jointly determine would further the goals and objectives of the executive committee.
“(VI) Additional members.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force may designate such additional members as the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force jointly determine to be appropriate.
“(iv) Operation.—The executive committee shall operate in accordance with the terms set forth in the memorandum of understanding under clause (i), which shall specify the officials or other individuals to be invited to participate in the executive committee in accordance with clause (iii).
“(v) Procedures.—Subject to clauses (vi) and (vii), the memorandum of understanding under clause (i) shall establish procedures for—
“(I) creating a forum for carrying out the purpose described in clause (ii);
“(II) rotating the Chairperson of the executive committee; and
“(III) scheduling regular meetings.
“(vi) Chairperson and vice chairperson.—
“(I) In general.—The members of the executive committee shall elect from among the members—
“(aa) 1 member to serve as the Chairperson of the executive committee; and
“(bb) 1 member to serve as the Vice Chairperson of the executive committee.
“(II) Duties.—The duties of each of the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson shall be included in the memorandum of understanding under clause (i).
“(vii) Meetings.—
“(I) Frequency.—The executive committee shall meet not less frequently than 3 times each calendar year.
“(II) Meeting locations.—Locations of meetings of the executive committee shall rotate to facilitate ease of access for all executive committee members.
“(III) Public accessibility.—Meetings of the executive committee shall—
“(aa) be open to the public; and
“(bb) provide a forum for the public to provide comment regarding the management of, and public access to, the Nevada Test and Training Range and the Desert National Wildlife Refuge.
“(viii) Conditions and terms of appointment.—
“(I) In general.—Each member of the executive committee shall serve voluntarily and without compensation.
“(II) Term of appointment.—
“(aa) In general.—Each member of the executive committee shall be appointed for a term of 4 years.
“(bb) Original members.—Notwithstanding item (aa), the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall select—
“(AA) ½ of the original members of the executive committee to serve for a term of 4 years; and
“(BB) ½ of the original members of the executive committee to serve for a term of 2 years.
“(III) Reappointment and replacement.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force may reappoint or replace a member of the executive committee if—
“(aa) the term of the member has expired;
“(bb) the member has resigned; or
“(cc) the position held by the member has changed to the extent that the ability of the member to represent the group or entity that the member represents has been significantly affected.
“(ix) Liaisons.—The Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Interior shall each appoint appropriate operational and land management personnel of the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Interior, respectively, to participate in, and serve as liaisons to, the executive committee.”
Subtitle F Asia-Pacific and Indo-Pacific Issues
SEC. 2851. Change to Biennial Reporting Requirement for Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment.
SEC. 2852. Additional Exception to Restriction on Development of Public Infrastructure in Connection with Realignment of Marine Corps Forces in Asia-Pacific Region.
SEC. 2853. Development of Master Plan for Infrastructure to Support Rotational Armed Forces in Australia.
SEC. 2854. Bulk Fuel Management in United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility.
Subtitle G Authorized Pilot Programs
SEC. 2861. Pilot Program to Authorize Use of Cost Savings Realized from Intergovernmental Services Agreements for Installation-Support Services.
“(e) Pilot Program for Use of Cost Savings Realized.—
(1) Each Secretary concerned shall conduct a pilot program under which the Secretary will make available to the commander of each military installation for which cost savings are realized as a result of an intergovernmental support agreement entered into under this section an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of the amount of such cost savings for that military installation for a fiscal year.
“(2) Amounts made available to an installation commander under paragraph (1) shall be used solely to address sustainment restoration and modernization requirements that have been approved by the major subordinate command or equivalent component.
“(3) With respect to each military installation for which amounts are made available to the installation commander under paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned shall certify, not less frequently than annually for each fiscal year of the pilot program, to the congressional defense committees the following:
“(A) The name of the installation and the amount of the cost savings achieved at the installation.
“(B) The source and type of intergovernmental support agreement that achieved the cost savings.
“(C) The amount of the cost savings made available to the installation commander under paragraph (1).
“(D) The sustainment restoration and modernization purposes for which the amount made available under paragraph (1) were used.
“(4) The authority to conduct the pilot program shall expire September 30, 2025.”
SEC. 2862. Department of Defense Pilot Program to Evaluate Expansion of Land Exchange Authority.
“(3)
(A) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program under which the Secretary concerned, during the term of the pilot program, may use the authority provided by paragraph (1) to also convey real property, including any improvements thereon, described in paragraph (2) to any person who agrees, in exchange for the real property, to provide—
“(i) installation-support services (as defined in 2679(e) of this title); or
“(ii) a new facility or improvements to an existing facility.
“(B) The acquisition of a facility or improvements to an existing facility using the authority provided by subparagraph (A) shall not be treated as a military construction project for which an authorization is required by section 2802 of this title.
“(C) The expanded conveyance authority provided by subparagraph (A) applies only during the five-year period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Defense issues guidance regarding the use by the Secretaries concerned of such authority.”
“(3) The Secretary concerned may agree to accept a facility or improvements to an existing facility under subsection (a)(3) only if the Secretary concerned determines that the facility or improvements—
“(A) are completed and usable, fully functional, and ready for occupancy;
“(B) satisfy all operational requirements; and
“(C) meet all Federal, State, and local requirements applicable to the facility relating to health, safety, and the environment.”
SEC. 2863. Pilot Program to Support Combatant Command Military Construction Priorities.
SEC. 2864. Pilot Program to Test Use of Emergency Diesel Generators in a Microgrid Configuration at Certain Military Installations.
SEC. 2865. Pilot Program to Authorize Additional Military Construction Projects for Child Development Centers at Military Installations.
SEC. 2866. Department of the Army Pilot Program for Development and Use of Online Real Estate Inventory Tool.
Subtitle H Miscellaneous Studies and Reports
SEC. 2871. Reports Regarding Decision-Making Process Used to Locate or Relocate Major Headquarters and Certain Military Units and Weapon Systems.
“§ 483. Notifications related to basing decision-making process
“(a) Notification Required.—At each point in the decision-making process specified in subsection (b), the Secretary concerned shall notify the congressional defense committees of the decision-making process to be used or the decision-making process used, whichever applies—
“(1) to select a military installation to serve as the first permanent location for a new major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system; or
“(2) to make a permanent change in the basing of a major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system by relocating the major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system from its current military installation to a different military installation.
“(b) Deadlines for Submission of Notice.—The Secretary concerned shall provide the notice required by subsection (a) within seven days after each of the following decision points during the decision-making process:
“(1) When the Secretary concerned issues any formal internal guidance to begin the decision-making process regarding the location or relocation of a major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system.
“(2) When the Secretary concerned selects between two and five military installations as the most likely candidate locations for a major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system in order to subject those installations to additional analysis.
“(3) When the Secretary concerned selects a specific military installation as the preferred location for the major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system.
“(c) Required Elements of Notification.—In a notice required by subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall include at a minimum the following:
“(1) A description of the manner in which the joint and all-domain training capabilities at each candidate location, if applicable to the type of basing decision-making process at issue, will be or was, whichever applies, comparatively analyzed among candidate military installations, separate from and in addition to the mission criteria to be used or that was used to make the basing decision.
“(2) A description of the manner in which the airspace and training areas available at each candidate location, if applicable to the type of basing decision-making process at issue, will be or was, whichever applies, comparatively analyzed among candidate military installations, separate from and in addition to the mission criteria to be used or that was used to make the basing decision.
“(3) A description of the manner in which community support for the basing decision-making process described in subsection (a) will be or was, whichever applies, comparatively analyzed among candidate military installations, including consultation with appropriate State officials and officials of units of local government in which each installation is located regarding matters affecting the local community, such as transportation, utility infrastructure, housing, education, and family support activities. In any case in which the Secretary concerned selects as the preferred location a military installation with less community support compared to other locations, as indicated by such a comparative analysis, an explanation of the operational considerations that formed the basis for such selection.
“(4) An explanation of how each candidate location will be or was, whichever applies, scored against the factors referred to in the preceding paragraphs, including the weight assigned to each factor.
“(5) A summary of any internal score cards that will be or were, whichever applies, used to make the basing decision.
“(d) Notice and Wait Requirements.—No irrevocable action may be taken to effect or implement a basing decision reached through the decision-making process described in subsection (a) until the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary concerned submits, in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title, the notice referred to in subsection (b)(3) regarding a preferred location for the major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system.
“(e) Annual Reporting Requirement.—
“(1) Report required.—Not later than 10 days after the date on which the budget request for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report providing the following:
“(A) An update on the status and anticipated completion date of each decision-making process that was commenced or was underway during the previous two fiscal years regarding the location or relocation of a major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system.
“(B) A list and description of anticipated basing decisions to be made regarding the location or relocation of a major headquarters, covered military unit, or major weapon system over the period covered by the future-years defense plan.
“(C) A timeline for a congressional engagement plan to brief the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate during the decision-making process and when decision notifications would be provided to interested Members of Congress.
“(2) Elements of report.—To satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1)(B), a report under this subsection shall include at a minimum the following:
“(A) An estimate of the number of members of the armed forces and civilian personnel potentially impacted by the basing decision.
“(B) The locations to be considered, if already known.
“(C) The expected timeline for beginning the decision-making process and reaching a final determination.
“(f) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘covered military unit’ means a unit of the armed forces whose initial assignment to a military installation or relocation from a military installation to a different military installation requires the preparation of an environmental impact statement in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
“(2) The term ‘major headquarters’ means the headquarters of a military unit or command that is the appropriate command of a general officer or flag officer.
“(3) The term ‘major weapon system’ means a weapon system that is treatable as a major system under section 2302(5) of title.
“(4) The term ‘military installation’ means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, including any leased facility, which is located within any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or Guam. Such term does not include any facility used primarily for civil works, rivers and harbors projects, or flood control projects.
“(5) The term ‘Secretary concerned’ means—
“(A) the Secretary of the military department concerned; and
“(B) the Secretary of Defense with respect to matters concerning the Defense Agencies and the Joint Staff.”
“483. Notifications related to basing decision-making process.”.
SEC. 2872. Report on Effect of Noise Restrictions on Military Installations and Operations and Development and Implementation of Noise Mitigation Measures.
SEC. 2873. Study and Report Regarding Continued Need for Protected Aircraft Shelters in Europe and Status of United States Air Base Resiliency in Europe.
Subtitle I Other Matters
SEC. 2881. Military Construction Infrastructure and Weapon System Synchronization for Ground Based Strategic Deterrent.
SEC. 2882. Defense Community Infrastructure Program.
“(B) The Secretary shall establish criteria for the selection of community infrastructure projects to receive assistance under this subsection, including selection of community infrastructure projects in the following order of priority:
“(i) Projects that will enhance military value at a military installation, taking into consideration the military value criteria originally developed by the Secretary in compliance with the amendment made by section 3002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1344).
“(ii) Projects that will enhance military installation resilience, as defined in section 101(e)(8) of this title.
“(iii) Projects that will enhance military family quality of life at a military installation, taking into consideration subsection (e)(4)(C).”
“(2)
(A) The criteria established for the selection of community infrastructure projects to receive assistance under this subsection shall include a requirement that, except as provided in subparagraph (B), the State or local government agree to contribute not less than 30 percent of the funding for the community infrastructure project.
“(B) If a proposed community infrastructure project will be carried out in a rural area or the Secretary of Defense determines that a proposed community infrastructure project is advantageous for reasons related to national security, the Secretary—
“(i) shall not penalize a State or local government for offering to make a contribution of 30 percent or less of the funding for the community infrastructure project; and
“(ii) may reduce the requirement for a State or local government contribution to 30 percent or less or waive the cost-sharing requirement entirely.”
“(C) For the purposes of determining whether proposed community infrastructure will enhance quality of life, the Secretary of Defense shall consider the impact of the community infrastructure on alleviating installation commuter workforce issues and the benefit of schools or other local infrastructure located off of a military installation that will support members of the armed forces and their dependents residing in the community.”
SEC. 2883. Consideration of Certain Military Family Readiness Issues in Making Basing Decisions Associated with Certain Military Units and Major Headquarters.
SEC. 2884. Department of Defense Policy for Regulation in Military Communities of Dangerous Dogs Kept as Pets.
TITLE XXIX Overseas Contingency Operations Military Construction
SEC. 2901. Authorized Navy Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| Country | Installation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | Rota | $59,230,000 |
SEC. 2902. Authorized Air Force Construction and Land Acquisition Projects.
| Country | Installation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | Ramstein | $36,345,000 |
| Spangdahlem Air Base | $25,824,000 | |
| Romania | Campia Turzii | $130,500,000 |